May 28, 2015
KUSH Electra EQ by UBK
Written by Nick Mitchell
Kush Audio and UBK became a familiar name in studios when they started modifying the original Empirical Labs FATSO into their own UBK | Kush Fatso. New York based Kush Audio started gaining a reputation by pushing these designs by Empirical Labs a little further by creating extra warmth and harmonic weight to what were already great devices. Shortly after the success of the UBK Fatso, Kush began developing new analog products, and later plugins, under their own name and original designs.
Their first analog hardware product was the unique Clariphonic EQ created to add air, sheen and presence by enhancing the signal with extra detail whether used on individual tracks or mix duties. Achieved through clever use of parallel and blending of signals, the Clariphonic provides easy musical controls to help shape your sound. When it was released a few years ago it created an amazing buzz in studio land, and continues to impress engineers around the world. So great was the success of the Clariphonic, from mixing studios to mastering suites, Kush decided to launch a plug-in version, the Clariphonic DSP ( recently updated to the Clariphonic DSP mkii ). Prior to this they had already launched a successful compressor plug-in called the Kush UBK-1.
The ELECTRA range
The Electrified Transient Equaliser or ELECTRA is available in the 500 Series format and two channel 19” Rack version. Both units are the same design, though the 19" version has a dedicated power supply and more metalwork, but both are the same EQ circuits. It's more a case of which version do you require, rather than a cut down or different sounding option. The basis of this review is with a pair of ELECTRA 500's but every point could easily refer to the 19” Rack version as they are identical in sound and control.
At first glance the dial controls show the large outer knob covering the frequencies and the inner small knob looking after the gain with +12db and -12db ranges. Interestingly there are hardly any frequency markings, which initially caused me to pause a little for thought… The reason you see, I was first taught to engineer by some amazing guys who had ears like bats ( not physically - thankfully ) but who could hear things I could only dream of at the time. They always said that with time and practice you won’t need to sweep through frequencies you’ll just dial in what you need. 2kHz for some crunch or 16Kz for air and you’ll just know that 250Hz will take out some fullness and 4kHz will give you some edge..etc etc They always stressed to me that a good engineer wouldn’t be sweeping frequencies, and used the analogy a good pianist wouldn’t just be wandering up and down the keys looking for the right note. These engineers knew their frequencies as well as anybody and they got there by being very disciplined in their approach, which is how I learnt. I was always told a good A-B comparison with EQ in and EQ out is better for the ear to compare as we lose perspective easily when we start to sweep. Now the reason for this side-note is due to the way the ELECTRA is designed. It is really pushing you TO sweep by not have frequency markings, so you can’t help but start to sweep and experiment a little. Certainly watching the Kush demo videos as well, it seems that Gregory Scott has the most fun when he does sweeps to find the resonating or offending frequencies and then cutting or boosting according to his vision. So who is to say one way is better than another if it gets you to the desired result? Well, perhaps the way to look at the ELECTRA is it’s not like other corrective EQ’s in a traditional sense …it’s a vibe EQ in a creative sense.